City’s Housing Plan-No Cause for Alarm
- Susan Goldbeck

- Aug 25
- 3 min read
Updated: Sep 5
by Susan Goldbeck

The California Department of Housing and Urban Development in 2022,
issued a mandate directed at all municipalities in California: each jurisdiction
would be subject to the requirement that a housing plan be developed to a facilitate
the future creation of new housing at all income levels. This directive was part of a
once- a -decade review of the housing needs in the state.
It outlined a comprehensive strategy to accommodate the projected growth
in urban populations and the related need for housing . This was to done through
adoption of plans which include updated policies and programs and a detailed site
inventory.
Pacific Grove’s amendments to the Housing Element in its General Plan,
which the City proposes to implement in response to this mandate, is nearing the
point where submission for certification by State officials will take place. The
Draft Environmental Impact Report as well as the plan itself will be at the City
Council level for its consideration and possible approval before the end of the year.
On August 13, the Pacific Grove Planning Commission had a review session
which was one of two it will have before they make a recommendation to the City
Council about the housing plan. The City Council can either accept or reject the
recommendations and can come up with their own changes if they deem them
appropriate. Once approved, it will send the City’s housing plan in for State
approval by the end of this year.
Each Planning Commissioner was well versed in the extremely lengthy reports
that were part of this approval process and each asked some very thoughtful
questions.
Commissioner David Sweigert complimented City staff for the good work
done on the plan. Community Development Director Jon Biggs and his Chief
Planner on the project Arron Campbell, were both at the meeting. Campbell had
been tasked with shepherding the City through the process of creating a revised
housing element in its General Plan and otherwise help create the city’s plan
which would meet state criteria and be certified.
Despite some citizen complaints at the session about the lack of public
outreach on the housing plan, there have been a number of study sessions which
by all accounts have been attended by a only a small number of residents,
business owners. and members of the public . At this point the period for public
input into the environmental impacts of the plan had closed earlier that month.
Biggs, in response to the complaint of insufficient public involvement , told
the Planning Commission that although only thirty people attended the last
public study session on August 9, 2025, that in his experience this was a typical
number of attendees to these types of review sessions. Campbell agreed and
added, “Actually I have gotten a lot of positive feedback from members of the
public about the City’s plan.”
Biggs was a long- time planner for the City many years ago, but has recently
returned recently to Pacific Grove to head up its Planning Department as Director
of Community Development. Biggs told the Beacon that after working for many
years in the City of Los Altos, he has had considerable experience working on that
city’s Housing Element. Los Altos, he said, had a similar demographic but
somewhat was t more high end than Pacific Grove.


.jpg)



Comments